Alexander Kwamena Afenyo-Markin, Minority Leader and Member of Parliament for Effutu, has raised concerns about the conduct of a Circuit Court 9 Judge in relation to the case involving Kwame Baffoe, Bono Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP).
In a statement shared on social media, Afenyo-Markin stated that questioning judicial conduct is both ethical and consistent with constitutional rights, particularly when actions may not align with the rule of law or the protection of citizens’ rights.
Afenyo-Markin indicated that there may be a recurring approach in the handling of politically related cases by the Circuit Court 9 Judge. He emphasized that raising such concerns is intended to support democratic accountability and constitutional oversight, rather than to serve as a personal criticism.
“I cannot, in good conscience, respect a Judge who has no respect for the law,” Afenyo-Markin stated in the post, adding that the Minority Caucus in Parliament would not remain silent on the matter.
He stated that the Minority Caucus plans to pursue parliamentary and constitutional procedures to address the concerns raised. He noted that judges, as public officials, are subject to legal and constitutional oversight.
Afenyo-Markin also called on the Chief Justice to monitor the conduct of the Circuit Court 9 Judge and to promote adherence to judicial ethics and professional standards.
Afenyo-Markin highlighted an alleged delay in providing the court’s ruling to the legal representatives of Abronye DC, noting that the ruling had reportedly not been made available six days after its delivery.
“Is it ethical for the Circuit Court 9 Judge in the Abronye case to refuse to release his ruling to Abronye’s lawyers after six days?” he queried.
These developments occur within the context of ongoing public and political discussions regarding judicial independence, accountability, and the relationship between the judiciary and political actors in Ghana.
Legal analysts note that public criticism of judicial decisions is permitted within democratic systems and often prompts broader discussions about balancing judicial independence with transparency and accountability.
As of the time of publication, the judiciary had not publicly responded to the remarks made by the Minority Leader.
By Stephen Takyi
May 19, 2026
